Figscreen vs Page Capture

Figscreen vs Page Capture

At a glance

Batch-first workflow

Import many URLs in one go—built for research decks and design audits.

Figma-native output

Frames land on your canvas with presets that mirror real devices.

Clear upgrade path

Transparent credits and plans so teams can scale without guesswork.

Figscreen compared to alternative

Figscreen

Figma plugin plus Chrome extension for high-quality screenshots, batch URL import, and device presets.

  • Figma plugin + Chrome extension
  • Batch import (up to 25 URLs)
  • HD images
  • 35+ presets
  • Streamlined workflow

Coming Soon

  • Block banners and pop-ups
  • Hide chat widgets
  • Remove ads effortlessly

Page Capture

Basic screenshot capabilities for everyday use in Figma.

  • Single capture
  • Standard quality
  • Limited presets
  • Basic workflow
  • No free plan
  • Basic capture tech

Who each tool is for

Figscreen

Designers and teams who capture many live pages for mood boards, UX reviews, and marketing collateral—especially when URL batching (up to 25 per run), HD device frames, and the Chrome extension for in-browser capture matter.

Page Capture

Individuals who need a quick single-frame snapshot inside Figma and can accept standard quality and a narrower feature set.

Takeaways

When Figscreen wins

You need batch URL import, sharper HD output, device presets, and a generous free tier to move faster inside Figma.

When to evaluate alternatives

You only need a single static capture occasionally and do not care about batching or device fidelity.

Bottom line

For product and marketing designers living in Figma, Figscreen reduces round-trips between browser and canvas.

Ready to capture sites straight into Figma with device presets and batch URL import?